Best Practices for Using AI Tools in Mental Health TherapyBest Practices for Using AI Tools in Mental Health Therapy

Therapists can take several measures to avoid common mistakes when using AI

4 Min Read
An illustration of a medial AI chatbot talking to a woman
Getty Images

AI continues to reshape the world of mental health therapy. From automating administrative tasks and tracking patient progress to providing real-time analysis and detecting early signs of mental health conditions, AI is proving its ability to make therapy more efficient. It’s not just about optimizing processes – AI has started to demonstrate its potential to improve patient outcomes and make mental health services more accessible at a time when they are critically needed.

Despite its growing benefits for both therapists and patients, integrating AI into therapy comes with its own set of challenges. If misused, AI can erode patient trust or lead to insufficient treatment recommendations, even misdiagnosis. In this article, I explore the most common mistakes therapists make when incorporating AI into their practice and offer practical advice on how to avoid them.

Not Addressing Patient Concerns About AI

A recent study by researchers at Columbia University found that while nearly half of the patients surveyed believe “AI may be beneficial for mental health care”, they also have concerns ranging from accuracy and misdiagnosis to data privacy issues and fears of losing personal connection with their therapist.

Therapists should address any concerns a patient may have about the use of AI from the outset. Whether patients are curious or cautious about AI, it’s important to be transparent about how the technology is being used. That means explaining how AI fits into the treatment process, discussing the limitations of AI tools, and ensuring informed consent is obtained for recording sessions and data processing. Transparency builds trust, and that trust is the foundation of effective therapy.

Related:CMO Trends for 2025: From AI to Redefining Growth

Overlooking Data Privacy Concerns

It’s no surprise that data privacy was one of the top concerns about the use of AI in therapy cited by patients in the same study. AI tools often require access to personal mental health data, and mishandling this information can lead to serious consequences like discrimination. Therefore, therapists need to be especially diligent when selecting AI tools.

First and foremost, it’s essential to choose AI tools that comply with privacy regulations such as HIPAA. Some platforms offer features like data encryption and anonymization to further protect sensitive information. But it doesn’t stop there. The key is not just selecting the right tool but also walking patients through how their data is being handled. When patients understand that their privacy is fully protected, they are much more likely to embrace AI in therapy sessions. 

Related:I’ll Do Anything For Productivity (But I Won’t Do That)

Not Being Critical of Data Quality

AI is only as reliable as the data it’s trained on, and this data is not always free from biases. In mental health, where cultural and socioeconomic factors significantly influence diagnosis and treatment, biases in training data or algorithms can lead to unfair treatment and perpetuate disparities. Without a critical assessment of AI outputs, therapists risk reinforcing these biases, potentially resulting in misguided treatment decisions.

 To avoid this, therapists should critically evaluate AI-generated reports and recommendations. This involves not only assessing their accuracy but also interpreting them within the broader context of the patient's background, experiences, and environment. Human oversight and discernment are key to ensuring that AI insights are applied appropriately and in context.

Relying Too Much on AI’s “Judgment”

Although AI has shown promise in detecting some mental health conditions, even at early stages, it cannot fully grasp the emotional depth or complex contexts that accompany mental health issues. AI can highlight patterns and flag potential problems, but it is incapable of replacing the nuanced understanding that comes from the therapeutic alliance – a bond of trust, empathy, and mutual understanding between therapist and patient.

Some therapists may become overly reliant on AI’s analysis when making treatment decisions. However, it’s crucial to remember that AI is a support tool, not a substitute for professional judgment. Even when AI flags specific behaviors or suggests particular interventions, it’s still the therapist’s responsibility to cross-check those findings with their own clinical observations and a deep understanding of the patient’s life circumstances. AI can assist with analysis, but it cannot replace the therapist’s expertise or the therapeutic relationship, which are essential for ensuring the best outcomes for patients.

AI is here to stay, and its role in mental health therapy will continue to grow. The potential for AI to enhance therapy is vast, but thoughtful integration is key. By being transparent with patients, safeguarding their privacy, critically evaluating AI data, and using AI as an assistive tool rather than a replacement for professional judgment, therapists can effectively incorporate AI into their practice without sacrificing the core values of mental health care.

Ultimately, therapy is about connection – and while AI can assist, it can never replace the empathy and trust that define the therapist-patient relationship.

About the Authors

Stanley Efrem

Clinical director and co-founder of Yung Sidekick, Yung Sidekick

Stanley Efrem is the clinical director and co-founder of Yung Sidekick. He is a psychotherapist and mental health counselor with over a decade of experience in private practice. He has contributed to the field of psychodrama as an Associate Professor at the Institute of Psychodrama and Psychological Counseling and has chaired major psychodramatic conferences. Previously, Stanley served as Chief Technology Officer and Co-Founder of Stratagam, a business simulation platform. He co-founded Yung Sidekick to leverage his background in psychodrama and technology to develop innovative AI tools for mental health professionals.

Michael Reider

CEO and co-founder of Yung Sidekick, Yung Sidekick

Michael Reider is the CEO and co-founder of Yung Sidekick. He is a serial entrepreneur and mental health advocate with over 10 years of experience in strategy consulting and executive management. Before co-founding Yung Sidekick, Michael led Bright Kitchen, a Cyprus-based dark kitchen chain, as CEO, and served as General Manager at Uber Eats. Michael holds an MBA in Strategic Management, Marketing, and Finance from Indiana University's Kelley School of Business. He leverages his diverse experience and passion for mental health to lead Yung Sidekick in developing AI tools that improve therapeutic outcomes for both therapists and patients.

Sign Up for the Newsletter
The most up-to-date AI news and insights delivered right to your inbox!

You May Also Like